<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Alpena - EdTribune AR - Arkansas Education Data</title><description>Education data coverage for Alpena. Data-driven education journalism for Arkansas. Every number verified against state DOE data.</description><link>https://ar.edtribune.com/</link><language>en-us</language><copyright>EdTribune 2026</copyright><item><title>Alpena: A 3,000-Student District That Kept Improving After Everyone Else Stopped</title><link>https://ar.edtribune.com/ar/2026-05-25-ar-alpena-steady-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://ar.edtribune.com/ar/2026-05-25-ar-alpena-steady-recovery/</guid><description>Alpena School District sits in the hill country where Boone and Carroll counties meet, about 20 miles south of the Missouri line. It is a 3,000-student system in a place where the nearest city of any ...</description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/ar/districts/alpena&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Alpena School District&lt;/a&gt; sits in the hill country where Boone and Carroll counties meet, about 20 miles south of the Missouri line. It is a 3,000-student system in a place where the nearest city of any size is Harrison, half an hour away.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 2023-24, Alpena posted a 9.8% chronic absence rate. The year before, it was 13.4%. The year before that, 26.1%. While 87% of Arkansas districts watched their attendance gains evaporate last year, Alpena kept improving. Its current rate sits well below the 18.1% it posted before the pandemic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Steady Improvement, No Drama&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alpena&apos;s trajectory lacks the dramatic single-year swings that characterize some other bright spots. The path is more notable for its consistency.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 2018-19, 586 of 3,244 students were chronically absent — an 18.1% rate. The COVID era brought the expected spike: 839 of 3,210 students in 2021-22, a rate of 26.1%. Then Alpena recovered, steadily, in two straight years: 13.4% in 2022-23, and 9.8% in 2023-24.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The district did not just recover to baseline — it surpassed it, landing 8.3 percentage points below its pre-COVID rate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/ar/img/2026-05-25-ar-alpena-steady-recovery-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Alpena vs. state average chronic absenteeism&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;536 Fewer Students Missing School&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In raw numbers, the improvement is substantial. Alpena went from 839 chronically absent students in 2021-22 to 303 in 2023-24 — a reduction of 536 students. The enrollment has been essentially flat (3,210 to 3,093), so this is almost entirely an attendance behavior change, not a composition effect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/ar/img/2026-05-25-ar-alpena-steady-recovery-count.png&quot; alt=&quot;Alpena chronically absent student counts&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Among the Best Large Districts&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At roughly 3,100 students, Alpena is large enough for its numbers to be statistically meaningful. Among all Arkansas districts with 2,000 or more students, Alpena ranked fourth-lowest in chronic absence in 2023-24 — behind only Premier High Schools (3.2%), Arkansas Lighthouse Charter Schools (5.2%), and Little Rock (6.7%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That a rural traditional district is keeping pace with specialized charter networks on attendance is notable on its own.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/ar/img/2026-05-25-ar-alpena-steady-recovery-peers.png&quot; alt=&quot;Alpena among large district peers&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;A Rural Multi-County Success&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alpena serves communities across parts of Boone, Carroll, and Newton counties in north-central Arkansas. Rural multi-county districts face logistical challenges that suburban districts do not: longer bus routes, fewer community supports, and the economic fragility that comes with small-town employment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alpena has posted consistent attendance improvement despite those headwinds. Something structural is at work here, not just a lucky year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The district did not respond to a request for comment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item><item><title>19 Arkansas Districts Defied Two Years of Rising Absence</title><link>https://ar.edtribune.com/ar/2026-04-27-ar-19-double-improvers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://ar.edtribune.com/ar/2026-04-27-ar-19-double-improvers/</guid><description>In 2022-23, most Arkansas districts improved on chronic absenteeism. The statewide rate fell from 26.9% to 17.7%, and 215 of 238 districts with data moved in the right direction. Recovery seemed under...</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In 2022-23, most Arkansas districts improved on chronic absenteeism. The statewide rate fell from 26.9% to 17.7%, and 215 of 238 districts with data moved in the right direction. Recovery seemed underway.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then 2023-24 arrived, and nearly everything reversed. The state rate jumped to 27.7% — an all-time high. Only 30 districts improved. The other 208 got worse.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just 19 districts improved in both years. Out of 238 districts with at least 200 students and data for all three years, fewer than 8% managed to swim against the current twice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/ar/img/2026-04-27-ar-19-double-improvers-funnel.png&quot; alt=&quot;Only 8% improved both years&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Not Flukes&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If improving twice in a row were random — if some districts just got lucky — you would expect the 19 to cluster around small enrollment numbers, where a handful of students can swing the rate. They do not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The group includes &lt;a href=&quot;/ar/districts/little-rock&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Little Rock School District&lt;/a&gt; (4,015 students), &lt;a href=&quot;/ar/districts/alpena&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Alpena&lt;/a&gt; (3,093), &lt;a href=&quot;/ar/districts/hoxie&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Hoxie&lt;/a&gt; (3,533), and &lt;a href=&quot;/ar/districts/malvern&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Malvern&lt;/a&gt; (2,514). It also includes &lt;a href=&quot;/ar/districts/west-memphis&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;West Memphis&lt;/a&gt; (778) and Des Arc (226). The size range spans from 226 to 4,015.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Geographically, the 19 come from across the state: the Delta (West Memphis, Earle, Forrest City), the Ozarks (Alpena, Flippin, Yellville-Summit), the River Valley (Magazine, Paris, Booneville, Clarksville), the state capital (Little Rock), and central Arkansas (Malvern, Pine Bluff). No single region explains the pattern.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The Magnitude&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The total improvement from 2021-22 to 2023-24 ranges widely. &lt;a href=&quot;/ar/districts/magazine&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Magazine&lt;/a&gt; led the group with a 27.1 percentage-point drop, from 36.2% to 9.1%. Little Rock followed with 21.6 points, then Malvern with 19.8, Paris with 19.8, and West Memphis with 17.1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the other end, Flippin improved by 2.6 points and Clarksville by 3.2 — modest but consistent, and enough to qualify in a year when the median Arkansas district got 11.7 points worse.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/ar/img/2026-04-27-ar-19-double-improvers-waterfall.png&quot; alt=&quot;Total improvement across the 19 districts&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The Divergence&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The average chronic rate across the 19 districts tells the divergence story clearly. In 2021-22, the group averaged rates broadly similar to the state. By 2023-24, the gap had widened dramatically — these 19 districts continued improving while the state reversed course.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/ar/img/2026-04-27-ar-19-double-improvers-divergence.png&quot; alt=&quot;The 19 diverged from the state in 2023-24&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Seven Fully Recovered&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of the 19 districts with pre-COVID data, seven have fully returned to or improved past their 2018-19 chronic absence rate. That means they not only undid the COVID-era spike — they are doing better than before the pandemic on attendance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The other 12 are still above their pre-COVID baselines but moving in the right direction. Given that most Arkansas districts are further from their baselines now than they were two years ago, even incomplete recovery with sustained momentum is notable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What They Share&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 19 districts do not share an obvious demographic or structural profile. They include high-poverty and moderate-poverty districts. They include charter schools and traditional public schools. They include districts with continuous calendars, four-day weeks, and standard schedules.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What they share is the outcome: two consecutive years of improvement during the worst attendance period in Arkansas history. In a state that just pledged to halve chronic absenteeism over five years, these 19 districts are the proof that sustained progress is possible — and the starting point for understanding how.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item></channel></rss>